Results of a few time trials
After flying all my drones back and forth the length of the flight room for a few months, I decided I needed more of a challenge: like a race course. After some thought, I decided to use crepe paper streamers to make gates to fly around and through. I took two eight-foot long pieces of paper, one blue and one orange, twisted them together and duct taped them to the ceiling and floor. I put four of them in a row across the 12-foot width of the room, thus making three gates each four-foot wide. I made three rows of gates, with rows being ten feet apart. I now had a slalom course with nine gates that I could fly through using a variety of different patterns.
Slalom Course looking North |
Slalom Course looking South |
I started out with the simplest course: a rectangle. Fly down the three gates on the left side, across the back and up through the three gates on the right. I wanted some quantitative measure of how well I could fly each of my quads on the course, so I decided to time each one in a three lap race around the course. I would start the stop watch on my wristwatch, take off from the launch pad on the floor, fly the three laps, land (or crash) into a bean bag landing zone and stop the clock.
I soon learned that flying this course was not easy! Part of the problem was my lack of experience and skill and partly the narrow size of the gates for the speed and quickness of some of the drones. A major problem was misjudging the speed of the quad and the distance to the back wall. Luckily, the walls are padded. I also chewed up plenty of streamers with the props. Using the slowest speed settings for each drone, I have completed the course 41 times. The best time was with my Syma D44: 37.06 seconds. Here is a list of the number of times I finished the course (three laps) for each drone and the best time for each:
Quadcopter Completions Best Time (seconds)
Syma D44 3 37.06
Ares Spidex 4 37.36
Sky Rover 2 38.44
Propel Spyder X 5 38.68
Swift Stream 5 39.89
Syma X13 5 44.45
Quadrone 2 46.63
Dromida Verso 1 52.89
Hubsan H107L 6 53.37
Dromida Kodo 1 54.37
Blade Nano 1 59.90
Sharper Image DX2 2 63.32
UDI U-27 2 64.49
Estes Proto Z 2 67.32
As can be seen from the results, there was quite a range of times over the entire fleet. I was able to get each one of my quads through the course at least once, but is was a challenge for a few. The best times, I feel, represent the quads that are the easiest for me to control and not necessarily the fastest ones. My Blade Nano is certainly the fastest drone in the fleet, but I just couldn't control it well enough on this tight course to get a good time. The Propel Spyder X set the record by having completed the course all of its five times on the same battery charge.
After a few days, I scrapped the slalom course, afraid I was going to do some major damage to a few of my drones. I then built a simple oval race course with a large pylon at each end of the flight room. Each pylon consisted of four two-stranded, twisted streamers attached to a paper plate at each end and tacked to the ceiling and taped to the floor.
I soon learned that flying this course was not easy! Part of the problem was my lack of experience and skill and partly the narrow size of the gates for the speed and quickness of some of the drones. A major problem was misjudging the speed of the quad and the distance to the back wall. Luckily, the walls are padded. I also chewed up plenty of streamers with the props. Using the slowest speed settings for each drone, I have completed the course 41 times. The best time was with my Syma D44: 37.06 seconds. Here is a list of the number of times I finished the course (three laps) for each drone and the best time for each:
Quadcopter Completions Best Time (seconds)
Syma D44 3 37.06
Ares Spidex 4 37.36
Sky Rover 2 38.44
Propel Spyder X 5 38.68
Swift Stream 5 39.89
Syma X13 5 44.45
Quadrone 2 46.63
Dromida Verso 1 52.89
Hubsan H107L 6 53.37
Dromida Kodo 1 54.37
Blade Nano 1 59.90
Sharper Image DX2 2 63.32
UDI U-27 2 64.49
Estes Proto Z 2 67.32
As can be seen from the results, there was quite a range of times over the entire fleet. I was able to get each one of my quads through the course at least once, but is was a challenge for a few. The best times, I feel, represent the quads that are the easiest for me to control and not necessarily the fastest ones. My Blade Nano is certainly the fastest drone in the fleet, but I just couldn't control it well enough on this tight course to get a good time. The Propel Spyder X set the record by having completed the course all of its five times on the same battery charge.
After a few days, I scrapped the slalom course, afraid I was going to do some major damage to a few of my drones. I then built a simple oval race course with a large pylon at each end of the flight room. Each pylon consisted of four two-stranded, twisted streamers attached to a paper plate at each end and tacked to the ceiling and taped to the floor.
Two Pylon Race Course |
Close-up View of a Pylon |
Again, I timed three laps around the course for each quad. The times dropped significantly for this new arrangement. With a total of 90 course completions the results were:
Quad Completions Best Time (seconds)
Quadrone Sparrow 6 25.81
Zoopa Riot 5 26.09
Propel Spyder X 17 27.07
Dromida Verso 7 27.53
Blade Nano 6 27.70
Dromida Kodo 6 28.48
Hubsan H107L 6 28.98
Swift Stream 6 29.21
Syma D44 7 29.27
Ares Spidex 15 30.24
Sky Rover 3 32.20
UDI U-841-1 1 35.95
Sky Rover 3 32.20
UDI U-841-1 1 35.95
Quadrone 2 36.54
Syma X-13 1 37.87
Sharper Image DX-2 1 38.03
UDI U-27 1 41.44
You will notice that a few new names appear on this course due to some new purchases. I could not get the Proto Z or the Quadrone Spark around the course to the finish, although, I tried. As before, I am sure that the times reflect my flying ability more than they do the quads' speeds. This course was much easier than the previous one and I enjoyed it a lot more.
Syma X-13 1 37.87
Sharper Image DX-2 1 38.03
UDI U-27 1 41.44
You will notice that a few new names appear on this course due to some new purchases. I could not get the Proto Z or the Quadrone Spark around the course to the finish, although, I tried. As before, I am sure that the times reflect my flying ability more than they do the quads' speeds. This course was much easier than the previous one and I enjoyed it a lot more.
No comments:
Post a Comment